[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev 1+g vs fast-forward (was longer)
From: |
dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev 1+g vs fast-forward (was longer) |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Feb 1999 00:32:03 -0500 (EST) |
> Whether that byte sequence is then recognized as KEY_BTAB depends on the
> curses in conjunction with the terminal description. If it isn't
> recognized, you may be able to help it along via the .lynx-keymaps mechanism
> (but that doesn't seem to be available for non-ncurses curses).
It might be doable - there's an undocumented function in SVr4 curses
that sound (to me) like it's intended to do the same thing as
ncurses define_key:
extern int newkey(char *, short, bool);
> Klaus
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: lynx-dev 1+g vs fast-forward (was longer),
dickey <=