lynx-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lynx-dev 1+g vs fast-forward (was longer)


From: dickey
Subject: Re: lynx-dev 1+g vs fast-forward (was longer)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 00:32:03 -0500 (EST)

> Whether that byte sequence is then recognized as KEY_BTAB depends on the 
> curses in conjunction with the terminal description.  If it isn't 
> recognized, you may be able to help it along via the .lynx-keymaps mechanism 
> (but that doesn't seem to be available for non-ncurses curses). 

It might be doable - there's an undocumented function in SVr4 curses
that sound (to me) like it's intended to do the same thing as
ncurses define_key:

        extern int newkey(char *, short, bool);

>   Klaus 


-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]