[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4
From: |
pg |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4 |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Jul 1999 10:13:03 -0600 (MDT) |
In a recent note, Klaus Weide said:
> Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 03:10:44 -0500 (CDT)
>
> On Sat, 17 Jul 1999 address@hidden wrote:
>
> > diff -bru orig/lynx2-8-3/src/HTML.c lynx2-8-3/src/HTML.c
> > --- orig/lynx2-8-3/src/HTML.c Wed Jul 14 10:25:26 1999
> > +++ lynx2-8-3/src/HTML.c Fri Jul 16 18:58:27 1999
> > @@ -2300,7 +2300,7 @@
> > value[HTML_NOTE_ROLE] &&
> > (!strcasecomp(value[HTML_NOTE_ROLE], "CAUTION") ||
> > !strcasecomp(value[HTML_NOTE_ROLE], "WARNING"))) {
> > - StrAllocCopy(note, value[HTML_NOTE_ROLE]);
> > + StrAllocCopy(note,(CONST char *) value[HTML_NOTE_ROLE]);
> > LYUpperCase(note);
> > StrAllocCat(note, ":");
> > } else {
>
> That one shouldn't be necessary.
>
I agree. I must have misread a line number on a message, then neglected
to back out an unnecessary change.
-- gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/07/15
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/07/15
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, pg, 1999/07/15
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/15
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, pg, 1999/07/16
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/16
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, pg, 1999/07/16
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/16
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, pg, 1999/07/17
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, Klaus Weide, 1999/07/17
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4,
pg <=
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, David Woolley, 1999/07/18
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, T.E.Dickey, 1999/07/15
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.4, Henry Nelson, 1999/07/15