[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch]
From: |
Kim DeVaughn |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch] |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:55:14 -0600 |
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999, Doug Kaufman (address@hidden) said:
|
| I propose a few changes to improve this. Firstly, I added the value
| ":" as a separator between the option and its value. This makes it
| much easier under DOS. I didn't see where it would adversely impact
| other systems. If it does, it can be ifdef'd to __DJGPP__.
Depends on how you define "adverse impact", I suppose, but ...
Many UNIX utilities (particularly gnu stuff) use the --option=value
syntax, whereas nothing that I'm aware of uses a ":" as a separator
for such cmd line args.
To avoid a confusing exception to common existing usage/syntax, I'd
really prefer to see the ":" alternate ifdef'd for DOS, and not used
in UNIX builds.
/kim
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Gisle Vanem, 1999/08/01
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch],
Kim DeVaughn <=
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Doug Kaufman, 1999/08/01
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Doug Kaufman, 1999/08/05
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Klaus Peter Wegge, 1999/08/05
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Doug Kaufman, 1999/08/05
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Klaus Peter Wegge, 1999/08/06
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Klaus Weide, 1999/08/06
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Klaus Peter Wegge, 1999/08/06
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Heather, 1999/08/06
- Re: lynx-dev Command-line options and DOS [patch], Doug Kaufman, 1999/08/06
- lynx-dev viewing html source, Klaus Peter Wegge, 1999/08/06