[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.6 - CHANGES nits
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.6 - CHANGES nits |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Aug 1999 11:18:08 +0400 (MSD) |
15-Aug-99 14:38 Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Leonid Pauzner wrote:
>> 13-Aug-99 11:07 Klaus Weide wrote:
>>
>> > s/if occasionally/even if/ ?
>>
>> Perhaps this one would be better:
>>
>> * LYCopyFile(): Thanks to Hiroyuki Senshu, DOS-based systems needs no cp.exe
>> binary any more. The code was originally ifdef'ed with SH_EX; now defined
>> with DOSPATH so used automatically by any dos/windows port, not used for
>> UNIXes (permissions?) -LP
> Yes, it is more readable.
> Using DOSPATH for this is ugly, IMHO. It continues inflation of that
> macro to mean yet one more thing. Whether to 'cp' or not 'cp' has
> not much to do with the form of filenames...
The comment below (and implied *_PATH definitions) ifdef'ed with DOSPATH in
userdefs.h so LYCopyFile() variant should be ifdef'ed that way at least.
> Btw, can/should this text now be changed? In userdefs.h:
> ** Currently, if compiled with -DUSE_ZLIB and without -DDIRED_SUPPORT
> ** (default), the following from the list below are required:
> ** COPY_PATH (cp.exe) - needed for file downloading
> ** MV_PATH (mv.exe) - for bookmark handling (DEL_BOOKMARK command)
> ....
Yes, the string about "cp.exe" should be removed (or commented out) for now
(I thought on it before doing changes but forget at last moment).
Not sure about MV_PATH - the code in LYBookmark.c is not clear for me
but _seems_ MV_PATH now unused when compiled with SH_EX (need some more work).
> Klaus
- lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.6, T.E.Dickey, 1999/08/13
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.6, Philip Webb, 1999/08/13
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.6, Vlad Harchev, 1999/08/14
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.6, Vlad Harchev, 1999/08/14
- lynx-dev Re: lynx2.8.3dev.6, Webmaster Jim, 1999/08/14