[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance in Lynx hangs the client
From: |
Klaus Weide |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance in Lynx hangs the client |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Sep 1999 15:19:50 -0500 (CDT) |
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Gregory A Lundberg wrote:
> It is more important to remember there ARE later RFCs.
>
> RFC 959 does not define the current FTP protocol. For a complete
> definition, you need to read several RFCs. The most-current FTP-specific
> RFCs are highlighted in boldface at http://www.wu-ftpd.org/rfc/
Btw. since you list RFCs 1738 and 1808, you should also add RFC 2396
which now updates them. (Yes, the lynx help pages also need to be
changed...)
Klaus
- Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), (continued)
- Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Gregory A Lundberg, 1999/09/07
- lynx-dev Most users' experience (was: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3...), Webmaster Jim, 1999/09/07
- Re: lynx-dev Most users' experience (was: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3...), Klaus Weide, 1999/09/07
- Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Klaus Weide, 1999/09/07
- Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Gregory A Lundberg, 1999/09/08
- Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Klaus Weide, 1999/09/10
- Re: 2.8.3dev.8 patch 3 (was: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance), Gregory A Lundberg, 1999/09/10
- Re: lynx-dev RFC959 non-compliance in Lynx hangs the client, Klaus Weide, 1999/09/07