[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx - files above 2GB in size - size reported by Lynx is
From: |
Thorsten Glaser |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx - files above 2GB in size - size reported by Lynx is not correct |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:26:58 +0000 (UTC) |
Tomas Liska dixit:
> I would like to report the issue, which I met just a few seconds ago. I
> downloaded a file, which has 4GB in size. The lynx is reporting the bad total
> size while downloading. It reports only 2GB. Although it reports a bad file
> size value, the file has been downloaded correctly. So I assume it is not an
> issue of functionality, but it is a case of comfort of the UI.
I suggest checking the server response too. For example,
address@hidden:~ $ openssl s_client -connect blah:443 -quiet -CApath
/etc/ssl/certs
HEAD /blah.iso HTTP/1.0
Host: blah
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:13:26 GMT
Server: httpd/3.30A (Unix)
Last-Modified: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:16:02 GMT
ETag: "80db1dfd13cbc3130d75f4d8e362b3a1639d78f7"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: -195461120
Connection: close
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
This is a bug in Apache.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
[...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but
what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be-
ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there
was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs