[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] Problem?
From: |
David Woolley |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] Problem? |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:54:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080421) |
Aidan C A Hopkins (Server Admin) wrote:
On further enquiry, it appears that Apache's mod_security rules think
that Lynx users are trying to inject commands (Error 406).
Error 406 is a content negotiation failure. Used correctly, it means
that there was no format of the resource, on the server, that was usable
according to the browser's Allow header.
Did you mean 405, which refers to the use of an unsupported method.
In any case, other replies suggest that this is discrimination against
Lynx, not something based on the actual request. Possible reasons for
such a policy migh that Lynx is often integrated into automatic tools.
Advertising funded sites, in particular, object to such tools, and some
spammers may be using Lynx as part of address collecting machines,
without changing the User-Agent.
<http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2616.html>:
10.4.7 406 Not Acceptable
The resource identified by the request is only capable of generating
response entities which have content characteristics not acceptable
according to the accept headers sent in the request.
10.4.6 405 Method Not Allowed
The method specified in the Request-Line is not allowed for the
resource identified by the Request-URI. The response MUST include an
Allow header containing a list of valid methods for the requested
resource.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.