[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing
From: |
Patrick |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Aug 2008 08:02:15 -0700 |
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 06:53:27 +0900
Henry Nelson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:01:07PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
[...]
>
> > > -- me, March 1999
> >
> > Now I must know this: is the "me" == HN?
>
> Yes. Next year it will be ten years. How things have changed in those
> years! Because of the capabilities of present day computers, Lynx
> no longer is essential to daily life. Both cpu cycles and memory size
> have increased close to 1000-fold from when I first started using Lynx.
> Graphic browsers have matured, too. So have OSs. I mean, why use Lynx
> for graphic content when Adobe Reader and OpenOffice are out there?
Please. Xpdf or Evince. I don't need a 116 MB viewer package,
when that viewer is only good for viewing *one* type of file.
[Could mention Abiword too, but if you prefer OpenOffice, you
prefer OpenOffice. No problem.]
> (BTW, MSIE, at least, uses these in exactly the same way Lynx executes
> its DOWNLOADER.)
Well it's a very simple, sensible way to deal with file-types the
browser itself can't display... which makes this very surprising,
since you're talking about a Microsoft program.
>
> __Henry
Patrick.
--
Yow! Am I having fun yet?
- [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing, Rado S, 2008/08/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing, Patrick, 2008/08/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing, Rado S, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing, Henry Nelson, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing, Thorsten Glaser, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing, Rado S, 2008/08/08
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing, Patrick, 2008/08/08
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing, Rado S, 2008/08/08
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing,
Patrick <=
Re: [Lynx-dev] Lynx pre-processing, Henry Nelson, 2008/08/07