[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] <PRE>...­...</PRE>
From: |
David Woolley |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] <PRE>...­...</PRE> |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:56:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914) |
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
And all 3 browsers collapse the soft hyphen. I wonder
whether this correct, or if it should be rendered as a
single character position, even as multiple horizontal
and vertical spaces are not collapsed in the range of
a <PRE>
The main effect of PRE is to preserve white space. One can override the
font to a proportional one.
Does some standard clarify this? What's the printable
representation of ­ in ISO-8859-1, anyway?
A hyphen, or nothing at all.
Soft hyphen isn't white space, so it is handled normally, i.e. it is
only takes up space at the end of a line (and then only under certain
other conditions, which are detailed in one of the Unicode appendices).
Using soft hyphens in pre is not a sensible thing to do!
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.