Re: [Lynx-dev] alt and title tag in images

[Stefan Caunter]

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Martin Sæta <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi.
> Is it possible to get lynx to remove the content in alt and title tags in
> images?

Adjust lynx.cfg or Options for the user to change how they are
displayed on the page.
Set images to "ignore".

> i.e. substitute img src=x.jpg alt="xyz" title="xyz" to img src=x.jpg alt=""
> title=""
>

use shell or perl for post processing

> Or is it possible to remove alt and title tag in image-tags completely?
>

again if this is a scripted crawl using a wrapper to pre-process URLs
and a block of code to post-process the returned html is a standard
technique.

> I'm using lynx to dump the content of web-pages for text search, and want
> nothing but the text in the web-page.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards Martin Saeta
> CTO Scan4news.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden På vegne av Y P
> Sendt: 21. januar 2009 09:41
> Til: David Woolley
> Emne: Re: [Lynx-dev] urg: looking for statically linked binary of lynx,
> please help!
>
> Thanx anyway,
> will look after other static bins (elinks, links2).
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:38:07PM +0000, David Woolley wrote:
>> Y P wrote:
>> >Hi:
>> >
>> >On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 08:07:49AM +0000, David Woolley wrote:
>> >>Seems to me that you can use a dynamically linked version, as long as
>> >>you have an appropriate LDLIBRARYPATH.
>> >
>> >I don't know ! I'm webmaster, not the server-admin. I don't know so much
>> >about rpm-based sysstems, I don't use such myself at home.
>>
>> LDLIBRARYPATH has nothing to do with RPMs.  Its fundamental to Unix
>> shared libraries.
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>Even if there wwe some reason
>> >>why you couldn't have shared objects, you could static link private
>> >>libraries and dynamic link system ones.
>> >
>> >The system doesn't authorizes to have a personalized .htaccess for
> Apache,
>> >and so more, so I won't ask them what -except paying enough for
>>
>> .htaccess has nothing to do with whether you use .so or .a libraries.
>>
>>
>> Generally though, I doubt that there is a sufficient demand for static
>> linked versions of Lynx, for anyone to have one available for download
>> for your platform.
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Woolley
>> Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
>> RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
>> that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
> --
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1 :
> Micro$oft has a majority market share in the new desktop PC marketplace.
> This is a bug, which Ubuntu is designed to fix !
> http://www.ubuntu.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>



-- 
Stefan

---
Stefan Caunter
905 517 0702
1 877 484 8637 x705
Skype: stefan.caunter
http://search-optimization.ca