[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element
From: |
Tim Chase |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element |
Date: |
Thu, 28 May 2009 13:32:38 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090302) |
Actually the button tag behaviour in all browsers i've tested
is to submit the form in which it is, without any javascript.
The reason i'm using it is because it can be easily styled
with css styles.
I'm not sure either is particularly harder to style than the other:
=======================================
<html>
<head>
<title>test</title>
<style>
#a {
background-color: red;
padding: 3em;
}
#b {
background-color: green;
padding: 7em;
}
.c {
border-width: 3em;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
This is a
<button id="a" class="c" value='Hello'>Button <b>with</b>
markup</button>
and this is
<input type="submit" id="b" class="c" value="<input
type='button'>" />
</body>
</html>
=======================================
The biggest difference I've found (beyond Lynx's rendering) is
that you can put HTML markup inside the <button> but not inside
the <input type='button'>. However both FireFox and IE allow for
styling either (shown above styling via both ids and classes)
Moreover, Lynx does not hide it, but renders a useless
[BUTTON] text, why?
I don't know how feasible it is, but it might not hurt to treat a
<button> tag as an <input type='submit'>
-tim
- [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element, info, 2009/05/28
- Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element, Thorsten Glaser, 2009/05/28
- Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element, Paul Gilmartin, 2009/05/28
- Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element, Ian Collier, 2009/05/28
- Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element, info, 2009/05/28
- Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element,
Tim Chase <=
- RE: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element, Larson, Timothy E., 2009/05/28
- Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element, Philip Webb, 2009/05/28
- Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element, Thomas Dickey, 2009/05/28
Re: [Lynx-dev] HTML BUTTON element, David Woolley, 2009/05/28