Re: [Lynx-dev] Re: support for data: URI scheme, please?

[David Woolley]

Thomas Dickey wrote:
    was encoded, be it XML, HTML, plain text, or whatever else.
> I'm talking about the parsing of the tag (perhaps I'm not seeing how 
> simple it is), as well as providing a stream for rendering (lynx's 
> notion of that is a little crude).

The tag will be a normal anchor, frame, image, etc., start tag.  It is 
just the attribute value that needs special handling.
>


--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.