[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury
From: |
Johnson, Tracy |
Subject: |
RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:33:31 -0500 |
My coder was only writing a web page. Not programming a browser.
Sorry for the confusion.
Tracy Johnson
Office 1-757-766-4318
address@hidden
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith BOWES [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 1:51 AM
> To: Johnson, Tracy
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury
>
> Je 2011-Feb-15 je 17:02, Johnson, Tracy skribis:
> > Correct, our current web-author is coding it for typical
> GUI browers and just became aware that it doesn't look too
> appealing with lynx. He is guessing lynx also doesn't work
> well with javascript.
> >
> It relies on JavaScript? That's bad. Even a typical, bloated,
> crash-prone GUI browser allows you to disable it. It's bad
> practice and
> in violation with WCAG. Just saying.
>
> --
> Keith Bowes <http://zooplah.farvista.net/>
>
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, (continued)
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Thomas Dickey, 2011/02/15
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Thomas Dickey, 2011/02/15
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Johnson, Tracy, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, David Woolley, 2011/02/15
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Johnson, Tracy, 2011/02/15
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Thorsten Glaser, 2011/02/15
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Johnson, Tracy, 2011/02/15
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Thorsten Glaser, 2011/02/15
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Johnson, Tracy, 2011/02/15
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Keith BOWES, 2011/02/18
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury,
Johnson, Tracy <=
- Re: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Keith BOWES, 2011/02/27
- RE: [Lynx-dev] Version Inqury, Johnson, Tracy, 2011/02/27