[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx via specific network interface
From: |
David Woolley |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] lynx via specific network interface |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:50:00 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) |
Pawel Chwalinski wrote:
Suppose we have 3 different interface installed on a computer, say,
eth1,eth2 and eth3.
Would it be possible to run lynx on any of them, given its name is
specified with a starting-up command?
Probably, if you changed the source code to do this, but it is not a
normal thing to do in an application program.
It would probably be much more useful if you told us what your top level
objective was. Then we might be able to suggest solutions that don't
break the layering between system and applications.
If you need to do this and can't achieve it by appropriate routing
tables, you are trying to abuse the system in some way.
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.