[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git
From: |
Keith BOWES |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:22:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
Je 2011-Jul-11 je 21:07, Thorsten Glaser skribis:
>
> No. git is not nice. It’s also suited only for the development model
> of the Linux kernel.
>
Absolutely. git is overused and misused. Its development model
supports the "everyone does their own thing and then when we're ready
for a new version, the changes are merged and made public." It seems
too cathedral and not enough bazaar.
--
Keith Bowes <http://zooplah.farvista.net/>
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, (continued)
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Dafydd Crosby, 2011/07/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Thorsten Glaser, 2011/07/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Thomas Dickey, 2011/07/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Keith BOWES, 2011/07/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Shérab, 2011/07/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Keith BOWES, 2011/07/14
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Thorsten Glaser, 2011/07/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Keith BOWES, 2011/07/14
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Thomas Dickey, 2011/07/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Thorsten Glaser, 2011/07/11
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git,
Keith BOWES <=
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Thomas Dickey, 2011/07/13
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Ken Hornstein, 2011/07/14
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Keith BOWES, 2011/07/16
- Re: [Lynx-dev] RCS to Git, Ken Hornstein, 2011/07/16