[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?
From: |
Steffen Nurpmeso |
Subject: |
Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Nov 2019 15:16:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
s-nail v14.9.15-202-ga6c89566 |
Karen Lewellen wrote in <Pine.LNX.4.64.1911061947350.17923@server2.shell\
world.net>:
|On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> David Woolley wrote in <b37a4e09-2152-ac08-bbd8-fc5626749d9a@david-wooll\
|> ey.me.uk>:
|>|On 05/11/2019 22:14, Karen Lewellen wrote:
|>|> 1. I do not, cannot physically use the windows operating system.
|>|
|>|Even if you are blind, the in industry expectation is that you use a
|>|program called JAWS, under Windows. In fact, many companies seem to
|>|think that all that is necessary for their web site to be accessible is
|>|that it can be used under JAWS.
|>|
|>|If you still want a non-graphical environment, Linux would be the
|>|operating system of choice.
|>|
|>|Whilst there are standards for remoting accessing mail, there are no
|>|effective ones for remotely accessing address books, etc., so if you use
|>|a network based service for this you have to accept that they will be
|>|targeting Windows users only, and any accessibility considerations will
|>|assume the use of JAWS + Windows.
|>
|> They plan to overcome that with the JMAP protocol, the mail part
|> of which became RFC 8621.
|>
|>|By insisting on MS-DOS, you are putting yourself in a position where it
|>|is becoming increasingly difficult to support your usage.
|May I ask on what you base my *insistence* on ms dos?
I did not say anything over DOS. Personally i was using 4DOS for
some years, until about ~20 years ago. For years, at least five
or six, i always want to install and try out FreeDOS, but did not
make it even when they had their jubilee. Maybe someday i make
it.
|Unfortunately, due to an auditory processing disorder tied to a surgical
|vascular accident, some frequencies, most software generated voices
|stimulate the dizzy centres of my brain.
|That means for me the safe ranges come from hardware sources, dectalk
|specifically.
|Given the quality of that speech, one would think those creating windows
|based programs would have kept the patents and code for those voices.
|Instead, one company bought another wasted resources and created
|disturbingly poor quality speech instead.
You could see me standing lost.
|To be sure I prefer a low graphics environment.
|Still as the saying goes DOS ain't dead, check out the djdpp project, or
|even freedos.
Yes, FreeDOS i would have interest in. And Haiku, too.
|What is largely dead? the assumption that humans even if they share a
|label , are still individuals, with unique bodies circumstances and
|preferences.
Yes, the individuals. But be aware of the masses.
|The assumption, often perpetuated by consumer groups and software makers
|is that all people sharing a label are Interchangeable.
|Did Linux write drivers t incorporate dectalk in products like the reading
|edge? no.
|Can dos be a graphical platform, certainly.
|Was access to basic html in gmail important to many, not even tied to
|accessibility?
|Absolutely, do a search for the phrase how do I access gmail in basic
|html? and you will find lots and lots of lists where people discuss the
|benefits for various reasons.
|before you decide I am insisting on anything perhaps ask why the platform
|is needful. Perhaps if more developers did not take a one user fits all
|approach, I would have safer voices to use.
Hm, hm. Well, well. I prefer the basic HTML too, on the other
hand i am lucky not to have a need to go to the web interface,
practically ever. Sometimes they force a login, sometimes mails
are too large to become forwarded to the address stuff gets
redirected to. (I do not really regulary use GMail as such no
more, via POP3 / IMAP / SMTP that is, only for testing, for which
i am thankful, i do have some GMail-only accounts, but these have
practically no traffic, and they are also forwarded, only SMTPS it
is for them, in practice.)
I never used anything beyond plain email at GMail, not a crime,
but a rhyme. He. Sorry.
--End of <address@hidden>
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, (continued)
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Karen Lewellen, 2019/11/05
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Tim Chase, 2019/11/05
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2019/11/05
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Karen Lewellen, 2019/11/05
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, David Woolley, 2019/11/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Jude DaShiell, 2019/11/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2019/11/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Jude DaShiell, 2019/11/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Karen Lewellen, 2019/11/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Karen Lewellen, 2019/11/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?,
Steffen Nurpmeso <=
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, David Woolley, 2019/11/06
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Steffen Nurpmeso, 2019/11/05
- Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, Karen Lewellen, 2019/11/05
Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, dan d., 2019/11/06
Re: [Lynx-dev] reaching gmail in basic html?, dan d., 2019/11/06