|
From: | Antonio Diaz Diaz |
Subject: | Re: [Lzip-bug] lzip -1 versus gzip -1 versus xz -1 |
Date: | Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:45:54 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050905 |
Hello Tino, Tino Lange wrote:
Why is lzip -1 so much slower than for example xz -1?
Because lzip was designed to complement gzip and bzip2, not to replace them. See here[1] what I mean.
[1] http://www.nongnu.org/lzip/benchmark.txt "Here are some tests showing how well lzip complements gzip and bzip2.As you can see, compressed sizes for each file decrease almost monotonically from top (gzip -1) to bottom (lzip -9)."
Regards, Antonio.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |