[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Maposmatic-dev] place=locality #9699
From: |
Florian Lohoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Maposmatic-dev] place=locality #9699 |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:20:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:53:58AM +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> Hello Florian,
>
> This is what is currently done:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/maposmatic/ocitysmap.git/tree/ocitysmap/indexlib/indexer.py#n412
> """
> where trim(name) != ''
> and (place = 'locality'
> or place = 'hamlet'
> or place = 'isolated_dwelling')
> """
>
> As as said, for this particular bug the issue is not technical but
> political. What is the general OSM worldwide consensus about the use
> of such tags? Is there such a consensus?
Initialy i said "place=locality" is something which should not
show up in "Villages". The Wiki explicitly mentiones it as an
uninhabited location. So it cant be a village.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality
"The place=locality tag can be used to name unpopulated place which is
not associated with any extant feature to which such a tag could be
associated"
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:place
Flurbezeichung. Name eines Ortes, wo keine Leute Leben (Flurname).
Here the German and the English version differ a bit - But both agree
that its an unpopulated place. The German documentation even goes
further and makes it a "Flurbezeichnung" which is a legal name for the
land registry.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff address@hidden
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature