Re: (cf "somefile.scm") error

[David Gray]

The debugger output is as follows:
Primitive called with incorrect number of arguments. #[primitive-procedure 13 
%record-length] 2

>S0  (if (not (primitive-arity-correct? primitive frame-size)) (error "Prim ...

                         SUBPROBLEM LEVEL: 0

COMPILED expression (from stack):
 Subproblem being executed is highlighted.

    (begin
     (if (not (primitive-arity-correct? primitive frame-size))
         (error "Primitive called with incorrect number of arguments."
                primitive
                frame-size))
     ((or (special-primitive-handler primitive)
          rtl:make-invocation:primitive)
      (|1+| frame-size)
      continuation
      primitive))

>S1  (let ((primitive (vector-ref (rvalue-known-value operator) 2))) (if (n ...

    (scfg*scfg->scfg!
     (prefix frame-size 0)
     (let ((primitive (vector-ref ... 2)))
       (if (not (primitive-arity-correct? primitive frame-size))
           (error "Primitive called with incorrect number of arguments."
                  primitive
                  frame-size))
       ((or (special-primitive-handler primitive)
            rtl:make-invocation:primitive)
        (|1+| frame-size)
        continuation
        primitive)))

>S2 (generate/node/no-memoize node)

 (rtl-precompress! (generate/node/no-memoize node))

>S3 (generate/node/ (edge-next-node) (vector-ref node 6)))

    (scfg*scfg->scfg! (generator node)
                      (generate/node (edge-next-node (vector-ref node 6))))

S4 to S9 are pairs the same as S2 and S3



> On 17 Oct 2023, at 10:49 PM, Chris Hanson <cph@chris-hanson.org> wrote:
> 
> Sorry for the long delay in responding.
> 
> I'd be interested in seeing what the debugger shows for that error. Can you 
> run it and show the first few frames to give me an idea where the problem is?
> 
> On 10/13/23 04:30, David Gray wrote:
>> How to track down the following error?
>> In the latest scheme (12.1) compiled exactly as the instructions for a unix 
>> binary and with a plain Xcode command line system I get a fully working 
>> system under the Monterey version of macOS. However from Ventura on I am not 
>> able to compile a simple scheme file. If the file has already been compiled 
>> under Monterey I can load the file and experience 50x faster function calls 
>> but I cannot re-compile it
>> The error is:
>> (cf "fib-sonoma.scm")
>> ;Generating SCode for file: "fib-sonoma.scm" => "fib-sonoma.bin"... done
>> ;Compiling file: "fib-sonoma.bin" => "fib-sonoma.com"...
>> ;Warning: Procedure called with wrong number of arguments 
>> #[primitive-procedure 15 %record-length] 2
>> ;Warning: Procedure called with wrong number of arguments 
>> #[primitive-procedure 15 %record-length] 2
>> ;Primitive called with incorrect number of arguments. #[primitive-procedure 
>> 15 %record-length] 2
>> ;To continue, call RESTART with an option number:
>> ; (RESTART 2) => Return to read-eval-print level 2.
>> What is the best way to try to track this down. I tried various things:
>> Compile mit-scheme x86_64 under Monterey and transfer to Sonoma
>> Compile mit-scheme x86_64 under Sonoma
>> Compile portable SVM under Sonoma
>> I’ve run out of energy to try gcc
>