[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Lost files.ini, perforate_file still necessary?
From: |
Sven Hartge |
Subject: |
[Mldonkey-users] Re: Lost files.ini, perforate_file still necessary? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:11:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.5.14-20020926 ("Soil") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.20-112 (i586)) |
Neil Sedger <address@hidden> wrote:
> Martin wrote:
>> Sven Hartge wrote...
>>> I was dumb again and lost my files.ini and files.ini.old.
>>> recover_temp worked well so far, only all downloads are back to 0.
>>> This happened to me some time ago and Goswin Brederlow was so kind
>>> to implement the perforate_file command which checks the temp-file
>>> against the chunk-md4s to see if the chunk is already present. But
>>> I have a feeling the 2.01+CVS versions already do this themselves
>>> when there are new bytes received for a file.
>> Even the 1.x version rehashed files for already downloaded
>> chunks....it just takes a while to hash the whole file again...just
>> be patience and everythink will be recovered
> Does it do this for paused files too or only for downloading ones?
As it seems: Only for downloading ones.
But: After a loss of files.ini, all files are downloading.
S°
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
149: Telefon
Gerät, das die Person am anderen Ende der Leitung bescheuert
macht. (Funktioniert in beide Richtungen)