[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging
From: |
Christian Lange |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:49:37 +0200 |
Hello,
>> may I suggest to use 2-6-xx tags for the main development releases and
>> keep 2-5-xx tags for the branch? I find it a bit confusing that the new
>> version in the 2-5-1-patches gets a 2-5-3 tag, while the newest
>> development version is 2-5-2.
> Yes, I was thinking also about that, but it was already too
> late. But the situation is a bit particular, a critical bug has been
> found just when a major architecture change was being done, which
> should not happen that often in the future...
I don't mind the branching, this is just what branches are for. I was
trying to point out the inconsistency of using the 2.5-xx version
numbers in the trunk and the branch. The next experimental release
should IMHO have a tag like 2-6-something, but *not* 2-5-4.
>> Also, naming the branch 2-5-patches would have seemed more logical to
>> me.
> Not a bad idea... but the branch was done from 2.5-1, that's the
> reason why it has this name. But yes, in the future, we should always
> create a branch directly from the stable release...
Agreed, but see above for the numbering on the trunk.
- Christian Lange, Berlin
--
- [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, Christian Lange, 2003/06/05
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, b8_bavard, 2003/06/05
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging,
Christian Lange <=
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, b8_bavard, 2003/06/05
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, Roland Arendes, 2003/06/05
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, Christian Klein, 2003/06/05
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, vnc, 2003/06/05
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, b8_bavard, 2003/06/06
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, Christian Lange, 2003/06/06
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, Jarek Hirny, 2003/06/05
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Tagging, Christian Lange, 2003/06/05