Re: Monit problems

[Martin Pala]

arthur.chereau wrote:

> Furthermore, the fact that "ssh" is a reserved
> keyword prevents users from using "ssh" as an application name.
Sorry, i forgot to exlain my oppinion to that. In the sense of 
/etc/services the name is correct.

Problem is, that the package (at least debian's) is named "ssh" and lot 
of users (me too) used in the past string "ssh" for monit's resource 
definition. I think that present solution is still good because we used 
for other protocol statement names (smtp, http, imap, etc.) the same 
rule => it is good to keep the concept.

In fact monitored process name is "sshd" - not "ssh" (which is service 
and client's name ) => the conflict isn't so bad. "secsh" is little bit 
strange (not usual) and it could make problems to understand for the 
majority of users at first look.

Cheers,
Martin