[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Re: Synchronising changes in two branches WITHOUT the f
|
From: |
Bruce Stephens |
|
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Re: Synchronising changes in two branches WITHOUT the full history? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 01 Sep 2004 14:54:59 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> monotone> Subversion allows it, but it doesn't remember merges at all,
>
> Oh great, and here I thought they were supposed to do that part
> better than CVS. Another nail in svn's coffin as far as I'm
> concerned...
Not yet. Better merging is for after 1.0, currently it's essentially
the same as CVS: <http://subversion.tigris.org/>.
I must admit, I'm surprised they didn't put in some kind of recording
of merges, even if they didn't plan on using it until later. Oh well.
[...]
- [Monotone-devel] Synchronising changes in two branches WITHOUT the full history?, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2004/09/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Synchronising changes in two branches WITHOUT the full history?, Derek Scherger, 2004/09/01
- [Monotone-devel] Deleting branches (was: Synchronising changes in two branches ...), Peter Simons, 2004/09/01
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Deleting branches (was: Synchronising changes in two branches ...), Bruce Stephens, 2004/09/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Deleting branches, Derek Scherger, 2004/09/01
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Deleting branches, Peter Simons, 2004/09/02
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Deleting branches, Bruce Stephens, 2004/09/02
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Deleting branches, Peter Simons, 2004/09/02
- [Monotone-devel] Re: Deleting branches, graydon hoare, 2004/09/05