[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Subversion Update Command Considered Harmful
From: |
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Subversion Update Command Considered Harmful |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:45:44 +0200 (CEST) |
In message <address@hidden> on Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:13:48 +0100, Bruce Stephens
<address@hidden> said:
monotone>
<http://willowbend.cx/2006/06/19/subversion-update-command-considered-harmful/>
monotone>
monotone> I'm not quite sure what it's saying, except that review is
monotone> important, and that CVS and subversion don't make it so
monotone> easy. I'm not sure why he argues that that makes git
monotone> better.
To me, it connects with what is suggest in the monotone manual,
commit-then-update-and-maybe-merge.
Other than that, I think the classic thing, to have the diffs of each
new change sent to a mailing list works well for review.
monotone> But anyway, it's another vote for the importance of workflow
monotone> support, I suppose.
Agreed.
Cheers,
Richard
-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.
--
Richard Levitte address@hidden
http://richard.levitte.org/
"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
-- C.S. Lewis