|
From: | Koen Kooi |
Subject: | [Monotone-devel] Re: Do we really need to IDN-encode cert names, keypair ids, and database variable domains? |
Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:37:12 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Zack Weinberg schreef: > Thoughts? I should emphasise that I'm not suggesting this for the > release Richard wants to make Thursday. That would be entirely too > risky. Also, as a data point, neither the Monotone nor the Pidgin > databases contain any strings that would be changed by this proposal. What about the OE database? And while on the OE subject, why not use the OE database in your performance tests, since it's by far the biggest and slooooooooowest repository that is publically available and used in real life -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFHGwGoMkyGM64RGpERAsPwAJ9Oef6v6lYdffmVqhnwIMGMuLgJgwCgpOdw bRIpqZgBQ/gvSmiigCn9pKI= =HLBY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |