Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: [Monotone-commits-diffs] net.venge.monotone.source-tree-cleanup: d54c8c17eeebbe7dd6bb30d4d10996db79de24f2

[Richard Levitte]

In message <address@hidden> on Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:36:46 -0500, Stephen Leake 
<address@hidden> said:

stephen_leake> Ok, that's a problem.
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> Maybe we can make EPS_FIGURES be empty on Win32 MinGW?
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> Is there a reason to build monotone.ps, when .pdf is available?
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> If it comes down to a choice between monotone.ps and 
win32-installer, I
stephen_leake> think we can live without monotone.ps.
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> this gets back to the question I asked:
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> What Makefile targets are supposed to work?
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> I tested monotone.pdf, but not monotone.ps. Is there some other 
target
stephen_leake> that builds monotone.ps? 'dist' apparently doesn't.
stephen_leake> 
stephen_leake> What other targets do I need to test when messing with Makefiles?

Have a look at revision adea9595011591375f0fc9c48bf741ae59cf328f, the
dependencies are a lot saner now.

Really, not having monotone.texi in a subdirectory compared to
Makefile.am is so much simpler.  The way automake differs in behavior
is huge (and I can understand why, considering all variants of make
it's trying to be compatible with!).

Cheers,
Richard

-- 
Richard Levitte                         address@hidden
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"Life is a tremendous celebration - and I'm invited!"
-- from a friend's blog, translated from Swedish