[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Soon time for a release
From: |
Thomas Keller |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Soon time for a release |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 00:36:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101129 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
Am 22.02.11 15:27, schrieb Richard Levitte:
> Hey there,
>
> Some time furign the winter (when we realised a Christmas release
> would be impossible), we said that we would release monotone v1.0
> withing Q1 2011. Q1 ends in a little more than a month (*), so it
> might be time to wrap it up a bit.
>
> The things I see left to do is this:
>
> 1. have a look at the open issues, try to classify the issues in
> milestones they should go into or simply fix them if it seems
> appropriate.
I think the issues listed under
https://code.monotone.ca/p/monotone/issues/label/399/open/
are (at least for me) the only dealbreakers for 1.0. We have of course
more bugs in the tracker, but I think most do not qualify to hold 1.0 back.
Personally there is only one more ticket, which is actually a regression
from 0.48 iirc, that is nagging me a bit, issue 132. Its not yet
targeted for 1.0 and I'd be ok if it goes into 1.1 or later as well.
> 2. go through the contrib/ directory and see what can and should be
> moved to somewhere in extra/, be moved somewhere else (the wiki
> on a 'tricks and tips' or 'contributed stuff'?), or tossed.
> If you want to toss something, please talk with the original author
> first.
You've been very busy in this area lately - thanks a bunch for all your
work! If we don't manage to move most of the contrib/ stuff, then I'm
all for removing it temporarily from the distribution and bring it back
step by step in the upcoming releases. Until then it can peacefully
co-exist just in the source tree.
> 3. at some point, we will create a separate branch for v1.0, probably
> named like the others, i.e. net.venge.monotone.monotone-1.0, and
> have that be frozen for changes except for serious bugs.
+1
> 4. general check that it works on as many systems as possible.
I hate to ask, but I guess we still have no news on the buildbot front,
right? I need to kick-off the openSUSE stuff again...
> Did I forget something? Please add to the list.
Just a note about the string unification - I'm all with you here. I'll
start with the placeholder unification tonight. Need some easy work,
I recently catched a cold, I hope I'm better by the end of the week.
Thomas.
--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature