[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Monotone-devel] Updated Issue 31 - running "monotone update" will delet
From: |
code |
Subject: |
[Monotone-devel] Updated Issue 31 - running "monotone update" will delete removed files even if they are modified (monotone) |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:46:28 +0100 (CET) |
Hello,
The following issue has been updated:
31 - running "monotone update" will delete removed files even if they are
modified
Project: monotone
Status: New
Reported by: Unknown User
URL: https://code.monotone.ca/p/monotone/issues/31/
Labels:
Type:Incorrect Behavior
Component:Working Copy
Priority:Medium
Comments (last first):
# By Thomas Keller, Feb 28, 2011:
By the way, src:address@hidden:monotone-0.99.1#1916 and the following lines
contains some code that actually _should_ fix the above bug already, but
apparently something is wrong there.
# By Thomas Keller, Feb 22, 2011:
It's possible to block the deletion at the time we're simulating the workspace
actions, just as we do for unknown files in deleted directories. Surely, this
is ugly since I have to re-calculate the sha1 hash for all deleted contents for
this check again (and this might be slow), so of course a better solution would
be to somehow hook into the merge process, which also would make the
consecutive warning messages not so confusing.
On the other hand, refactoring (re-using) the `--move-conflicting-files`
machinery for this use case also has its charm, something like
`--fix-conflicting-files` that would copy the changes of the specific file into
_MTN/resolutions and afterwards revert the file in the workspace to its
original contents, so the update / delete can happen without problems. Thirdly,
this could also be useful for conflicting updates, that would otherwise let the
3-way merge tool of choice pop up.
Example output of the xfailing test `update_with_pending_modification` that
runs on an mtn with the attached patch incorporated:
mtn: selected update target 47865ec3f917ee38393ec3f72a216923845d4ade
mtn: [left] c1a3a631a5d670e6fdba5fe124ceaa87549f5699
mtn: [right] 47865ec3f917ee38393ec3f72a216923845d4ade
mtn: warning: Content changes to the file 'file2'
mtn: warning: will be ignored during this merge as the file has been
mtn: warning: removed on one side of the merge. Affected revisions include:
mtn: warning: Revision: c1a3a631a5d670e6fdba5fe124ceaa87549f5699
mtn: warning: cannot drop file 'file2' with local changes
mtn: misuse: re-run this command with --move-conflicting-paths to move
conflicting paths out of the way.
Attachments:
- issue-31.diff - 1.06 kB
https://code.monotone.ca/p/monotone/issues/view/attachment/23/issue-31.diff
# By Stephen Leake, Aug 12, 2010:
Clearly not fixed.
nvm.automate_show_conflicts only fixed stuff in merge, not update. So I must
have been confused when I posted comment #2.
This _will_ be fixed when I get around to improving update to handle conflicts
properly.
# By Thomas Keller, Aug 11, 2010:
Is this really fixed? The test in question is still shows the expected failure.
# By Stephen Leake, Aug 15, 2008:
fixed in branch net.venge.monotone.automate_show_conflicts; it now reports a
content/drop conflict.
# By Markus Wanner, Feb 4, 2008:
Added unit test update_with_pending_modification, which checks for that bug.
# By Unknown User, Nov 25, 2005:
(This entry was imported from the savannah tracker, original location:
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?15058)
see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/monotone-devel/2005-10/msg00249.html
--
Issue: https://code.monotone.ca/p/monotone/issues/31/