Re: [MPFRCPP] order of initialization of globals

[Richard]

In article <address@hidden>,
    Alexey Beshenov <address@hidden>  writes:

> Yes, that's right. Since MPFRCPP is an interface, there's nothing to test 
> except possibility of compilation. Numeric part of MPFRCPP depends on GMP / 
> MPFR. Both GMP and MPFR come with tests. Numerically, there's nothing to test
> in MPFRCPP. I think I should add this note in MPFRCPP documentation (I agree 
> that current 'tests' look confusing).

OK, that makes more sense.  Unfortunately the VS.NET compilation
projects I obtained for the underlying gmp/mpfr aren't compiling the
tests.  Grrr.  I need to get the gmp/mpfr tests compiled and executing
in order to get some confidence in the underlying library.

> MPFRCPP could be compiled with every modern C++ compiler, I think. It is 
> stable now, but it comes without Automake stuff. I'm very interested in real 
> projects using MPFRCPP, so, please, contact me with any comments, questions 
> and suggestions.

Its mostly compiling.  There are two projects that don't compile at
the moment, but I'm not sure if its my fault yet :-).  Automake/configure
is fine for *nix based platforms, but it doesn't work well on Windows
unless you use cygwin/gcc, which I'm not.
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
      <http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/download/index.html>

        Legalize Adulthood! <http://blogs.xmission.com/legalize/>