[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Extended regex badness (Was: Re: [Nano-devel] homepage - "latest
From: |
David Lawrence Ramsey |
Subject: |
Re: Extended regex badness (Was: Re: [Nano-devel] homepage - "latest version 1.0.9") |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 20:54:03 -0700 (PDT) |
--- Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 07:26:44PM -0700, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
>> --- Chris Allegretta <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Apparently so; sorry I missed that. Changing the "\{" and
>> "\}" to "{" and "}" in the c-file regex fixes it.
>>
>> I just looked it up. According to the regex(7) manpage, {
>> and } denote bounds in extended regexps, while in ordinary
>> regexps, \{ and \} denote bounds, and { and } are ordinary
>> characters. So changing the \{ and \} in the c-file regex
>> to { and } will fix it. Sorry I missed that; I apparently
>> tested all the regex-using functions except for color ...
>
>*laugh*, no need to apologize when I'm being too lazy to RTFM :) I will
>update the nanorc.sample in CVS and my local .nanorc.
And I probably shouldn't say the same thing twice, as I just
noticed I did. (Note to self: must proofread posts more
carefully.)
_____________________________________________________________
Sluggy.Net: The Sluggy Freelance Community!
_____________________________________________________________
Promote your group and strengthen ties to your members with address@hidden by
Everyone.net http://www.everyone.net/?btn=tag