Re: [Nano-devel] Recent nanomiscbugs2.patch changes

[David Lawrence Ramsey]

Good catch.  Fixed now in nanomiscbugs2.patch.


_____________________________________________________________
Sluggy.Net: The Sluggy Freelance Community!

_____________________________________________________________
Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get address@hidden w/No Ads, 
6MB, POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag

--- Begin Message --- Subject: [Nano-devel] Recent nanomiscbugs2.patch changes Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:10:40 -0400 User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:10:46PM -0700, David Lawrence Ramsey wrote:
> The tweaks are in nanomiscbugs2.patch, along with ... a port of DB's
> getopt() cleanup (don't check for h or ?, just let them fall through to
> default:, which will call usage() and exit, which is what we want to do
> in those cases anyway).

Ack!  I was wrong, getopt() needs h and ?.  Otherwise, "nano -?" gives an
error message

nano: invalid option -- ?

followed by the Usage information.  The patches at
www.math.cornell.edu/~dbenbenn/nano/ have been updated to leave the option
string alone.  (They will be synced with CVS shortly.)

pgp755RQ7VyIQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---