Re: [Nano-devel] Patch for !ncurses

[David Ramsey]

Oops, forgot the other wrefresh() instance.

On Dec 3, 2007 12:55 PM, David Ramsey <address@hidden> wrote:

<snip>

> Regarding patch 2: A wrefresh() every time the cursor moves gets
> expensive in terms of screen updates.  Also, nano uses wnoutrefresh()
> after reset_cursor() in other places.  So, does adding
> "wnoutrefresh(edit);" instead of "wrefresh(edit);" in the place the
> second patch does work with NetBSD curses?

To clarify: If you change all the wrefresh() calls both these patches
add to wnoutrefresh() calls (taking the same window parameters), does it
fix the cursor update problem?

Sorry for any confusion.