[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour
|
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour |
|
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 16:37:03 +0200 |
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014, at 16:34, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> I would like to propose the attached very simple patch:
> reset the cutbuffer whenever a ^K resets the mark.
The patch avoids the segfault and makes the undos behave
nicely and completely as expected.
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
http://www.fastmail.fm/help/overview_quotes.html
- Re: [Nano-devel] found a small failure in the undo stuff, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] found a small failure in the undo stuff, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] found a small failure in the undo stuff, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/08
- [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/13
- Re: [Nano-devel] having text marked/selected, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/13
- [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour,
Benno Schulenberg <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/14
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Chris Allegretta, 2014/06/16
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Benno Schulenberg, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Mark Majeres, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Nano-devel] a proposed slight change in behaviour, Chris Allegretta, 2014/06/17