[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:18:16 +0100 |
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016, at 19:23, Chris Allegretta wrote:
> Hmm, I thought we'd settled on doing it at the 2.6.0 release.
We can call the next version 2.6.0. We don't have any roadmap,
no things planned for 2.5.4, 2.5.5, do we?
> I'm curious what the rationale to switch now would be?
The sooner the better. And I'd like to start moving to gnulib,
and to properly register Mike as the author of those patches,
we need git.
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Accessible with your email software
or over the web
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/06
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/07
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo,
Benno Schulenberg <=
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/03/08
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Jordi Mallach, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Benno Schulenberg, 2016/03/09
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/10
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Chris Allegretta, 2016/03/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Mike Frysinger, 2016/03/29
- Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo, Jordi Mallach, 2016/03/30