|
From: | Richard Kolb II |
Subject: | Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo |
Date: | Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:31:00 -0400 |
I do feel like we should remove all the files actually, no point in
having a dead repo sitting around. I think checking out trunk from
SVN should just produce a README which says to go use git. If people
have local changes, presumably trying to SVN up would produce a
conflict and not delete their changes.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 04 Apr 2016 20:51, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016, at 04:15, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > they've removed the old git repo and i've pushed up my copy now.
>> > feel free to make any announcements.
>>
>> Should we also make a final commit to SVN, to say that development
>> has moved to git and the SVN repo is dead / abandoned / left as a
>> monument?
>
> makes sense to me. could add a flag file like '!!MOVED-TO-GIT' or
> update the configure file to use AC_MSG_ERROR([moved to git]). i
> don't think we'd want to delete all the files.
> -mike
_______________________________________________
Nano-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nano-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |