[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nano-devel] Fwd: Re: how should piping through an external command
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nano-devel] Fwd: Re: how should piping through an external command work? |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Feb 2018 11:34:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
Op 20-02-18 om 03:17 schreef Brand Huntsman:
>>> The terrible selection saving in writeout (who voted to do that?)
>>
>> It was added in May 2001, commit cc197ef0, without giving any reason
>
> Ugh, so the recent patches that keep a selection after performing an action
> are to blame.
To blame for what? The keeping of a selection (made by holding down Shift)
should happen only after commenting/uncommenting and indenting/unindenting.
If the selection persists in other cases, then this is a bug.
> Could we require a toggle in writeout to switch to saving a selection?
> Because how often does anyone write a selection to a different file?
Start a new thread, with a good subject line, and ask.
Benno
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Pipe selected text to external tool, (continued)
- Re: [Nano-devel] how should piping through an external command work?, Brand Huntsman, 2018/02/18
- Re: [Nano-devel] how should piping through an external command work?, Benno Schulenberg, 2018/02/19
- [Nano-devel] Fwd: Re: how should piping through an external command work?, Benno Schulenberg, 2018/02/19
- Re: [Nano-devel] Fwd: Re: how should piping through an external command work?, Brand Huntsman, 2018/02/19
- Re: [Nano-devel] Fwd: Re: how should piping through an external command work?,
Benno Schulenberg <=
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Pipe selected text to external tool, David Ramsey, 2018/02/18
Re: [Nano-devel] [PATCH] Pipe selected text to external tool, David Ramsey, 2018/02/18