[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:30:15 -0500 |
I just committed support for Content-Disposition headers in
mhbuild directives. I elected for the point solution, using
optional {}, instead of a more general solution. It just
seems more appropriate to me. And there are no issues with
backward compatibility.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] send/whatnow -attach option, Jon Steinhart, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, Oliver Kiddle, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header, David Levine, 2006/02/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhbuild Content-Disposition header,
David Levine <=