[Nmh-workers] Re: mail threading headers

[Bill Wohler]

Paul Fox <address@hidden> writes:

> [ so far so good (modulo the fact that i have no idea how one would
> attempt to reply to more than one message at once) ]

In MH-E, you can yank text from multiple messages into your reply.
While you're not replying to those messages directly, it's like you
were. I guess. Perhaps we should be appending those Message-IDs to the
In-Reply-To field when we do that. Thoughts?

> so -- how important is it to use In-reply-to in a new References
> header if there was no previous References header?  the default
> nmh template doesn't do it.  should we care?

Good observation. If someone can update the recipe, I think it would
be a good idea.

-- 
Bill Wohler <address@hidden>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.