[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions
From: |
Jon Steinhart |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:40:16 -0700 |
> > Based on the recent emails, I am thinking about a small modification
> > to sendfile() in whatnowsbr.c. This change would be to skip the test
> > for automimeproc if attach (in Whatnow(), would have to be made global)
> > is set.
>
> I'm not entirely sure what you mean in code terms, but I'd much prefer it
> if automimeproc and attach were handled in the same place, and that this
> test could be an || of them.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Joel
That was my plan.
- [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Jon Steinhart, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions,
Jon Steinhart <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Jon Steinhart, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Norman Shapiro, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Norman Shapiro, 2006/07/18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attach and automimeproc interactions, Robert Elz, 2006/07/19