[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage
From: |
der_wachtmeister |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:21:12 +0200 |
> > > > I added those 2 lines to .mh_profile but still doesn't work.
> > > > Error message:
> > > >
> > > > mhbuild: draft shouldn't contain MIME-Version: field
> > > >
> > > > And this is the draft message:
> > > >
> > > > To:address@hidden
> > > > cc:
> > > > From:address@hidden
> > > > Fcc: +outbox
> > > > Subject:test attach
> > > > X-MH-Attachment: /Users/phil/Desktop
> > > > X-MH-Attachment: /Users/phil/Desktop/Job-Sites.pdf
> > > > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> > > > Content-ID: <address@hidden>
> > >
> > > You can't MIMEfy a message twice, which is what this has tried to do.
> > > The presence of an attach header in the draft causes it to be MIMEfied,
> > > if I remember correctly, so the draft must *not* be MIMEfied when you
> > > send it.
> > >
> > > Did you run it through mhbuild manually or do you have automimeproc set?
> >
> > I have "automimeproc: 1" set in my .mh_profile.
> > It looks like the message already gets MIMEfied when (or before) I do
> > 'attach <filename>' and the AGAIN when I 'send'
>
> No, that's not quite what is happening. automimeproc is an indication
> that whatnow should call buildmimeproc on the draft prior to sending.
>
> The attach headers are not mhbuild directives, however, so they're
> left untouched by this call to buildmimeproc. Instead, they're picked
> up by code in send which assumes the draft has not been MIMEfied,
> translates the attach headers into mhbuild directives, and runs the
> result through mhbuild (again).
>
> So the problem is a conjunction of the fact that two programs (whatnow and
> send) are responsible for calling mhbuild automatically, and the fact that
> the attach code in send assumes the message is still an unMIMEfied draft.
>
> > Speaking about bugs: the first "X-MH-Attachment:" shouldn't be there, right?
>
> I don't think it should be there. In fact, I wonder what the attach code
> would do with that. Attach your whole home directory?
Fortunately not: it attaches a zero bytes file called "phil" (my username).
Philipp
- [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage, der_wachtmeister, 2006/07/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage, Ralph Corderoy, 2006/07/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage, Jon Steinhart, 2006/07/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage, der_wachtmeister, 2006/07/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2006/07/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage, der_wachtmeister, 2006/07/17
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage, Joel Reicher, 2006/07/23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow attach usage,
der_wachtmeister <=