Re: [Nmh-workers] Re: should nmh be an MTA or an MUA?

[Paul Fox]

earl wrote:
 > or via external programs.  Neither ssmtp, msmtp, or nullmailer have
 > interfaces that nmh expects (from what I gather from documentation).
 > They function as drop-in replacements for sendmail and not as SMTP
 > proxies.  None support the -bs option, which nmh/MH use when in
 > sendmail mode.

can someone remind me why this is so?  (i.e., the use of -bs mode?)

paul
=---------------------
 paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 33.4 degrees)