[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:52:55 -0500 |
>I would expect most distros to use either /usr/include or /opt/mumble.
>The mumble might be standardized by now, I dunno. Perhaps I'm
>far enough removed from distros these days that I'm wrong; that would
>be nice.
Note that with the OLD autoconf code, if you actually did
--with-cyrus-sasl=/usr/include, the following things would happen:
- SAL_INCLUDES would be defined with the value of -I/usr/include/include
- SASL_LDFLAGS would be defined with the value of -L/usr/include/lib
(or maybe it was SASL_LIBS).
So unless the Debian folks actually patched configure.in, then I doubt
it was doing what they thought it did.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Peter Maydell, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Ken Hornstein, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX), 2010/11/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Oliver Kiddle, 2010/11/20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2010/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2010/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Ken Hornstein, 2010/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Earl Hood, 2010/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Peter Maydell, 2010/11/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Chad Brown, 2010/11/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature,
Ken Hornstein <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, Joel Uckelman, 2010/11/21
Re: [Nmh-workers] Autoconf changes & new feature, David Levine, 2010/11/21