[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Minor git nits, and autotools junk
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Minor git nits, and autotools junk |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:42:14 +0000 |
Ken Hornstein wrote:
> [git stuff]
This brings up a question -- do we want to move to having
patches posted to the mailing list for review before they
are committed? That's what other git-using projects I deal
with do, and it's much easier to do that emailing with git...
> Anyway, I guess my point here is: I'm thinking of converting nmh over to
> Automake; I've started using it for a few projects here, and it just
> Makes Things Easier.
I'm not much of a fan of automake. I think our current
makefiles are fine, personally.
> (Despite me earlier trashing of
> libtool, I was kinda surprised to discover that nmh ALREADY uses libtool
> today; yikes!).
No we don't, not if you mean GNU libtool. We check for and use
the MacOS libtool (which is a sort of ar+ranlib replacement, apparently)
and we carefully avoid running libtool if it's the GNU one. (Check
the ChangeLog.)
>- Unrelated to that, I'm kinda getting tired of the damn warnings when I
> run autoreconf about acconfig.h; I'm thinking of putting the rest of
> the things in acconfig.h into autoconf via --enable switches; comments?
I think we should clean that up and get rid of the warnings, yes.
-- PMM