[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion)
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion) |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:21:22 -0500 |
>>Thanks. This doesn't actually apply to current head of git,
>>mostly because we removed the CVS keyword-substitution lines
>>when we moved over, but also the configure.in patch doesn't
>>apply any more because the context has changed. It would
>>probably be a good idea to rebase it at some point.
>
>Note: might be a good idea to have "git pull" do a rebase automatically
>by doing "git config --add --bool branch.master.rebase true".
Actually, let me clarify: that's probably a good idea for people who are
NOT developers and are working off of the read-only git repo. Developers
should probably not do that unless they know what they are doing.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] whatnowproc tab completion, rader, 2010/12/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnowproc tab completion, Jon Steinhart, 2010/12/19
- [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion), rader, 2010/12/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion), Peter Maydell, 2010/12/19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion), rader, 2010/12/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion), Peter Maydell, 2010/12/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion), rader, 2010/12/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion), Peter Maydell, 2010/12/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion), Valdis . Kletnieks, 2010/12/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion), Ken Hornstein, 2010/12/21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion),
Ken Hornstein <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnowproc tab completion, Ralph Corderoy, 2010/12/19