[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Holes (was: nmh in near, medium, and far-term)
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Holes (was: nmh in near, medium, and far-term) |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jan 2012 15:57:02 -0500 |
bill wrote:
> Paul Vixie <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On 12/6/2011 8:43 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> >>>> It seems that IMAP has the concept of a "message sequence number",
> >>>> which is a number from 1 to the number of messages in a folder; that
> >>>> might be the right thing to use.
> >
> > no. MH message numbers can have holes and can be reassigned. IMAP is
> > always 1..N, no holes.
>
> You know, unless I'm missing something, the holes in our messages
> numbers could be considered a bug. I find it annoying to have to use
> "folder -pack" occasionally. If we kept our folders packed, then we
> could get rid of the folder -pack option.
huh. am i the only one that keeps adding digits to the scan display
format? :-)
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 50.4 degrees)