[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post
From: |
Tethys |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Mar 2012 09:53:43 +0000 |
Ken Hornstein writes:
>My thinking was that since bounces go to the SMTP envelope-from,
>bounces should go back to the person who wrote the message. In the
>example above, I'd want to know about a bounced email, rather than
>my secretary
If you're the sort of person that has a secretary send email for you
(probably less common now than when the RFCs were drafted, but still...)
then you'd want the bounce to go to the secretary and have them deal
with it, since you're clearly too busy for such minutiae.
As such, I'd say if Sender is present, always prefer it over From,
regardless of how many From addresses there are. This will hold
true even if you don't have a secretary. If you've specified a
Sender, I can't imagine why you'd want bounces to go elsewhere.
Tet
- [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post,
Tethys <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Paul Fox, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Paul Fox, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Robert Elz, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to post, Robert Elz, 2012/03/12