Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?

[rader]

 >>> Punt until the m_getfld() re-write

If this was a five-9s thing, like 99.999% working, then I'd be down for that.
But it's not, and maybe the fix is fairly simple?


 >> If we guess wrong, that would result in one extra read in some cases.

Do I understand correctly that we're wringing our hands over one extra read
per msg < 100% of the time?


 >> We know what "width" is, and the body can't
 >> be longer than that.  So we could say that the body has to be at least
 >> width characters (or we reach EOF).

If that looks easy, just do it?

steve
--