[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was
From: |
Ronald F. Guilmette |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given. |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:32:28 -0700 |
In message <address@hidden>,
Ken Hornstein <address@hidden> wrote:
>>Full disclosure: I am using NMH version 1.3. Alas, version 1.4 has not
>>been ported to FreeBSD yet. (Is this the real root of the problem?)
>
>When you say "not ported" ... do you mean, "It doesn't work when I
>tried to compile it?", because that's a serious problem. Or do you
>mean, "Not in the ports system", which is also a problem, but not
>one we have control over.
The latter. Sorry for not being clear.
Regards,
rfg
P.S. I have sent an informal inquiry to the maintainer of FreeBSD port of
NMH, asking if an update to 1.4 might perhaps be in the offing anytime soon.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ronald F. Guilmette, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ronald F. Guilmette, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ronald F. Guilmette, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ronald F. Guilmette, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Ken Hornstein, 2012/03/15
Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header field name was given., Jon Steinhart, 2012/03/15