[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual? |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:51:34 -0400 |
Ken wrote:
> That is basically the same thing as doing a rebase, except that way is
> more work. It would invalidate every checked-out copy of the revision
> control tree. It _might_ be useful, but would it be worth it?
I think not, if there's not a reasonable way to deal with
checked-out copies.
David
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/03/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?, David Levine, 2012/03/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/03/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?, Bill Wohler, 2012/03/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?, David Levine, 2012/03/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?, David Levine, 2012/03/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh User's Manual?,
David Levine <=