[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Jun 2012 23:24:16 -0400 |
i wrote:
>
> however: that being said, neither your one-liner above, nor a
> "scan -form <nmh-etc-dir>/scan.default" of the messages in question
> does the right thing. clearly they should, so clearly now the problem
> is on my end.
turns out MM_CHARSET wasn't set properly. i have shell wrappers
around most other MH programs that care about MM_CHARSET, and it gets
set in those wrappers. now that i've set it for scan, and updated
my scan form file, that works too.
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 60.1 degrees)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, valdis . kletnieks, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Paul Fox, 2012/06/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Oliver Kiddle, 2012/06/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Ken Hornstein, 2012/06/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names, Tethys, 2012/06/10
Re: [Nmh-workers] question about encoded recipient names,
Paul Fox <=